"Many seek to become a Syndicated Columnist, while the few strive to be a Vindicated Publisher . . . "

Inquiries to: batrsartre@gmail.com


Iraq War Cost

BATR News Updates by email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Visit BATR News the compliment to BREAKING ALL THE RULES News

news you won't find in the mainstream media

Trump Against the War Party

War is the great clarifier. The Russian move to quash both ISIS and the US-backed jihadist movement aimed at overthrowing Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad has defined the lines of demarcation between the candidates for US President in both parties, and shown us what they are made of.

The issue at hand: should the US impose a “no-fly” zone in Syria, or parts of it, in order to stop the Russians from spoiling our little party?

On the one side, we have the President of the United States, who – foiled by popular opinion when he last tried to massively intervene in Syria’s civil war – has apparently learned his lesson. He opposes a no-fly zone, at least for the moment. The Russian attempt to “prop up” Assad” is “just going to get them stuck in a quagmire,” he said at a news conference, “and it won’t work, and they will be there for a while if they don’t take a different course.” He went on to describe “half-baked” ideas about what to do in response to the Russian move, later claiming that he wasn’t talking about Hillary Clinton’s support for a no-fly zone – although it’s hard to take him at his word on that. Clinton "is not half-baked in terms of her approach to these problems,” he said, but "there’s a difference between running for president and being president. And the decisions that are being made and the discussions that I’m having with the Joint Chiefs become much more specific and require, I think, a different kind of judgment. If and when she’s president, then she’ll make those judgments.”

Speaking of the Joint Chiefs, as a presidential candidate Mrs. Clinton doesn’t have to deal with the Pentagon, which is reportedly against imposing a no-fly zone – since they will be charged with enforcing it while somehow avoiding a clash with the Russians over Syrian airspace. In short, if the War Party has its way, the US military will once again be charged with an impossible task, and the Pentagon is none too eager to be blamed for the inevitable resulting disaster.

Freed of the Pentagon’s restraining hand, Clinton, for her part, told a Boston television station:

Read the entire article

Subscribe to Newsletter daily updates

Best Videos on BATR News

SARTRE Commentary


BATR Tumblr Videos


national debt

Subscribe to BREAKING ALL THE RULES News by Email


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

sent to your email
Enter your Email

Powered by FeedBlitz

Batr Sartre | BREAKING ALL THE RULES Facebook

© 2000-2018: Another BATR Site

add BREAKING ALL THE RULES News to blogroll